Voice in Case Studies
The most
immediate difference between the two types of case study (at least for me) is
that in the non-fiction version, the tutor is a tangible character. His biases
are immediately apparent, and I found myself responding to his voice more than
just the information contained within the piece. One of the aspects of this
that I admired is that by his own voice being so foregrounded, it highlights
the presence of the tutor in the Writing Center relationship. It shows the
tutor/tutee relationship as formed by two individual personalities and
intellectual approaches. Further, it emphasizes the collaborative nature of the
relationship and doesn’t isolate the student on their own with tutors
represented as a set of stated Writing Center values.
Because of the
essay’s structure, however, it isn’t as immediately clear what the larger takeaway
may be of Goedde’s case study. In fact, it’s a structure that rejects any
reader who may approach it solely looking for a quick takeaway. In more
academic (and scientific) case studies, the structure often clearly identifies
for the reader (sometimes by use of very explicit section headings) where
specific information can be gathered, including research conclusions. It is
written, presumably, toward an audience looking for practices that may be
replicable. Goedde’s essay, on the other hand, has not been composed with this
in mind. The essay encourages reflection on various educational ideas (academic
vs. creative writing; directive vs. non-directive tutoring) without directly
recommending new or studied approaches for instructors/tutors.
Comments
Post a Comment